Am I doing something wrong? Qwen 3.8 27B seems useless for agentic coding
Summary
A user reports difficulties using the Qwen 3.8 27B model for agentic coding tasks, noting inefficiencies and errors compared to other models, and seeks advice on potential setup issues.
Similar Articles
Qwen 3.6 27B absolutely fails at agentic work
A user reports that Qwen 3.6 27B, while strong on single prompts, fails at agentic tasks with frequent errors, leading them to revert to Qwen 3.5 122B.
My thoughts on qwen 3.8 so far with agentic coding.
A personal review of using the Qwen 3.8 model for agentic coding, praising its ability to handle complex tasks like integrating llama.cpp with Godot while noting issues with looping.
I can't get Qwen3.6 27B to outperform Qwen-Coder-Next and I'm not sure why
A user reports that Qwen-Coder-Next outperforms Qwen3.6 27B in both real-world tests and synthetic benchmarks, despite others praising 27B, and seeks advice on possible setup issues.
Qwen 35b a3b surprises me
User reports positive experience with Qwen 35b a3b for agentic coding tasks, noting it outperforms Gemma4 26b in their use case and works well for demo/data analytics, especially in agentic mode versus chat.
Qwen3.8-27B Q6 is a beast at agentic coding
User feedback indicates that Qwen3.8-27B Q6 demonstrates high performance in agentic coding tasks, maintaining 60-63 tokens/s over 20 hours on dual NVIDIA GPUs.