Tried to write a book with ai for a year - honest breakdown!!!

Reddit r/artificial News

Summary

A writer shares a year-long experiment using AI to write a book, finding that generating text directly fails but using AI to analyze and improve one's own writing holds real value.

Started this experiment curious, ending it with some actual opinions Month 1-3: Using AI to generate text and paste it in. Word count went up, quality went down, nothing sounded like me. Month 3-5: Realised generation was the wrong use case. started using it to interrogate my own writing instead and results smh got more interesting. Month 5-8: Figured out that output quality depends almost entirely on how much context the AI has. Same prompt, different context, completely different result. Month 8-12: Found a setup where the AI reads my actual manuscript rather than a chat window. Everything before this feels like a different tool. The learning curve is real and most people quit somewhere in months 1-3 when the generated text disappoints them. The actual value is somewhere else entirely.
Original Article

Similar Articles

Not all uses of AI for writing are slop

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence

The author describes using AI to generate questions and a deliberately poor first draft as a technique to overcome writer's block and memory issues, resulting in faster writing without any AI-written text in the final product.

On using AI as a writing assistant

Lobsters Hottest

A personal essay reflecting on the author's workflow for using AI as a writing assistant, arguing that it helps structure fluid thoughts while noting that AI output often feels stilted and less cohesive after editing.