Does Scaling Toward AGI Depend on What System-1 Lets System-2 Execute?
Summary
论文提出 conditional interaction 框架,通过 System-1 轻量预测器筛选高价值交互、仅让 System-2 执行被接纳的候选,从而以 1/ρ_u 因子降低执行计算成本,并主张以密度可测的 ρ_u 和 informative compute 更好地描述扩展效率。
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 11/02/26, 03:26 AM
Paper page - Does Scaling Toward AGI Depend on What System-1 Lets System-2 Execute?
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.39497 Published on Oct 29
·
Submitted byhttps://huggingface.co/yunqu
Yun Quon Nov 2
#3 Paper of the day Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
Co-designing a resource-heavy reasoning system with a lightweight predictive evaluator can reduce execution costs by filtering interactions, with efficiency governed by the density of useful interactions.
Progress toward artificial general intelligence (AGI) has largely relied on scaling a resource-intensive executive,System-2, through larger models, more data and compute, longer reasoning, and more agents. We ask whether the next stage may come instead from co-designing it withSystem-1, a lightweight, semantically aware predictor that evaluates candidate interactions before execution, so thatSystem-2acts only on those worth their cost. Our answer is a qualified yes. We studyconditional interaction, a predict--gate--execute--update loop:System-1estimates each candidate’s utility,System-2executes those admitted by anadaptive threshold, and the outcomes updateSystem-1. The loop spans training, test-time reasoning, adaptive decision-making, and agentic tool use, with utility and cost defined by the application. Under ideal screening and equal execution costs, execution compute falls by a factor approaching 1/ρ_u, where ρ_u is the density of utility-relevant interactions (cost-weighted when costs differ); prediction errors, exploration, and distribution shift reduce the saving. We boundselection regretby predictor error and theutility margin. These results motivate our central hypothesis: ρ_u is a measurable coordinate ofscaling efficiencyand makesinformative computea better description of scaling than total compute.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageAdd to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610\.39497
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.39497 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.39497 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.39497 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
When Reality Outpaces Cognition: A New Scaling Principle for Reliable Intelligence
提出了一种新的可扩展性原则——'有效连贯认知速度'(S_C^eff),用于衡量AI系统在现实变化速度超出训练分布时维持可靠行为的能力,并展示了受意识机制启发的Co⁴架构相比Transformer和gated-MLP基线在此指标上表现更优。
Position: Agentic AI System Is a Foreseeable Pathway to AGI
This paper argues that monolithic scaling of a single model is insufficient for achieving AGI and proposes Agentic AI with multi-agent collaboration as a necessary paradigm, demonstrating theoretically that agentic systems achieve exponentially superior generalization and sample efficiency.
How to make System 1 LLMs show System 2 competencies?
该研究探讨如何让采用快速直觉式推理(System 1)的大语言模型展现出慢速、分析性的 System 2 推理能力,可能提出相应的训练或提示方法。
As we scale toward agentic, multimodal systems combining LLMs, RLHF, tool-use, and retrieval-augmented generation, what practical architecture best balances reliability, alignment, and cost?
The article debates whether future AI systems should use a unified agent stack or modular ensembles, and advocates for more realistic robustness benchmarks beyond static evaluations.
@dair_ai: System scaling is the next real bottleneck in agentic AI. If you build agent orchestration layers, this is a clean map …
This paper argues that agentic AI's next bottleneck is system scaling (designing the 'harness' around foundation models), not just model scaling, and introduces CheetahClaws, a Python-native reference harness, along with an analysis of three core bottlenecks: context governance, trustworthy memory, and dynamic skill routing.