@omarsar0: Exactly! Let’s attack the safety problem with rigorous science and engineering. Great to see Jensen and more recently M…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

A tweet from @omarsar0 advocating for addressing AI safety through rigorous science and engineering, referencing Jensen Huang's perspective on safety as an engineering problem.

Exactly! Let’s attack the safety problem with rigorous science and engineering. Great to see Jensen and more recently Mark bring some sense into this conversation. Not sure how we have allowed this alignment stuff to become so political and sci-fi. We need to go back to fundamentals. If your model or AI product by extension is unsafe/defective, it’s your responsibility to fix it.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/16/26, 07:58 AM

Exactly! Let’s attack the safety problem with rigorous science and engineering. Great to see Jensen and more recently Mark bring some sense into this conversation. Not sure how we have allowed this alignment stuff to become so political and sci-fi. We need to go back to fundamentals. If your model or AI product by extension is unsafe/defective, it’s your responsibility to fix it.

David Sacks (@DavidSacks): Jensen Huang: “Safety is paramount. In a lot of ways, it’s job one. However, safety is an engineering problem… If we’re not confident about the safety of the products — like all companies, like you and I, all the companies here — if you build a product or a service and you’re

Similar Articles

@elonmusk: Extremely important point

X AI KOLs Following

Jensen Huang emphasizes that defenders need a frontier AI ecosystem combining open and closed models, citing a Hugging Face incident where an open-weight model helped contain an intrusion that closed AI blocked.