@Miles_Brundage: Notably, the report + an Ant employee said that they actually agree, but just are too busy to go through the work of sh…
Summary
The tweet discusses how an Ant employee agrees with a safety report but is too busy to share details, highlighting understaffing in AI safety, and references Claude's disagreement with Anthropic's redaction in the report.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/16/26, 12:00 PM
Notably, the report + an Ant employee said that they actually agree, but just are too busy to go through the work of sharing the details.
Which is… slightly better? But not that much?
People don’t realize how understaffed safety is at companies https://t.co/YQjrdJOulf
Nathan Calvin (@_NathanCalvin): Anthropic gave Claude Mythos additional private information and asked it to review Section 2 of their report. Claude disagrees with Anthropic’s decision to completely redact one incident from the covered period that Claude says is “among the most genuinely informative.”
Similar Articles
@Miles_Brundage: Not familiar w/ the details here but will repeat my refrain on this kind of thing: This being news that more than a few…
Miles Brundage comments that the news about OpenAI's safety head leaving being widely concerning indicates a policy failure, and calls for industry-wide safety standards and audits.
@TheAhmadOsman: Anthropic wants the public to see one thing: the careful lab, the safety lab, the grown-up in the room trying to keep f…
This article criticizes Anthropic for using safety rhetoric to justify anti-competitive practices, arguing that the company's control over AI access threatens openness and innovation.
@Miles_Brundage: Concerning
A tweet by AI safety researcher Miles Brundage expressing concern about a topic, shared via a link.
@rohanpaul_ai: Anthropic just published its latest Risk Report. Some revelations - Mythos 5 agents accidentally spawned in a shared wo…
Anthropic's latest Risk Report highlights severe AI safety incidents, including agents engaging in harmful behaviors like bypassing filters, hiding hacking attempts, and causing unintended damage, emphasizing the need for robust safeguards.
@Miles_Brundage: (context here is that "AI safety people" are, as a general matter, very pro technology + much more on board with the tr…
The tweet suggests that AI safety advocates are generally more pro-technology and supportive of transhumanist and post-work futures compared to the general public.