@_akhaliq: Representing the Unseen Rethinking Visual Imagination for Spatial Reasoning paper: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.3…

X AI KOLs Timeline Papers

Summary

The paper introduces ImagiRep, a simulator-grounded benchmark showing that spatial reasoning benefits from diverse representations beyond RGB, and proposes GEARS, a lightweight test-time strategy for adaptively selecting representations to improve reasoning about unobserved states.

Representing the Unseen Rethinking Visual Imagination for Spatial Reasoning paper: https://t.co/SgjDTxldcm https://t.co/jILqFiwrp1
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/28/26, 07:43 PM

Representing the Unseen

Rethinking Visual Imagination for Spatial Reasoning

paper: https://t.co/SgjDTxldcm https://t.co/jILqFiwrp1


Paper page - Representing the Unseen: Rethinking Visual Imagination for Spatial Reasoning

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.37437

Abstract

ImagiRep reveals that spatial reasoning benefits from diverse representations beyond RGB, and GEARS adaptively selects representations to improve reasoning about unobserved states.

Visual world modelsincreasingly supportspatial reasoningby generatingRGBviews of unobserved states. However,RGBhas become the default interface largely because it is well suited for visual generation, rather than necessarily being the most effective representation for downstream reasoning. Different spatial questions may benefit from different representations of the same imagined state:top-down geometrycan facilitate global distance comparisons, whilepanoramic viewsprovide broader context for reasoning about open space. To isolate the role of representation in spatial imagination, we introduceImagiRep, a simulator-grounded benchmark of 922 questions spanning seven question types across two settings, Viewpoint Imagination andCross-view Integration, providing oracleRGBand six alternative representations (e.g.,depth,panoramic views, andtop-down geometry) of the same unobserved state. This controlled comparison reveals that even accurate imaginedRGBdoes not guarantee accuratespatial reasoning, and different questions benefit from different representations. Similar trends hold for representations derived from world-model-estimated states. Notably, estimatedRGBalone can misleadspatial reasoning, while alternative representations retain complementary benefits. Building on these findings, we introduceGEARS, a lightweight test-time strategy foradaptive representation selection, outperforming existing spatial imagination methods and showing that reasoning about unseen states requires more than generatingRGBviews.

View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610\.37437

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.37437 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper1

#### Imagirep/ImagiRep Viewer• Updatedabout 5 hours ago • 922

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.37437 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

Thinking with Visual Grounding

Hugging Face Daily Papers

This paper introduces visually grounded thinking, a method for vision-language models to interleave natural-language reasoning with explicit visual evidence grounding using points or boxes. A scalable synthesis pipeline and grounding-aware reinforcement learning improve reasoning accuracy, enabling a 4B model to match or surpass a 27B model on spatial and counting benchmarks.

SpatialASM: Internalizing Active Mentalization for Spatial Reasoning

Hugging Face Daily Papers

The paper introduces SpatialASM, a framework that trains large vision-language models to actively plan task-relevant viewpoints and mentally imagine missing spatial evidence via novel-view synthesis scaffolding, improving spatial reasoning across four backbones and seven benchmarks without extra views at inference.