1x32GB V100 vs 2x16GB V100 vs 5060ti 16GB for QWEN 3.8
Summary
A user is considering upgrading from a 5060ti 16GB to either 1x32GB V100 or 2x16GB V100 for better performance with the Qwen 3.8 model using llama.cpp, and asking for other options in a similar price range.
Similar Articles
TQwen 3.8 flash next ud1s on 6gb vram and 16 gb system ram
A user shares their experience running the Qwen 3.8 flash next model on a system with 6GB VRAM and 16GB RAM using llama.cpp, achieving 6-7 tokens per second with 1-bit quantization, and asks for recommendations on quantization variants.
Anyone running qwen 3.8 27b on 5070ti (16GB)?
A user asks if running the Qwen 3.8 27b model on a 5070ti GPU with 16GB VRAM is feasible using quantization for agentic coding purposes.
Devs - you have 64gb of VRAM - which model do you use for coding?
A developer with 64GB VRAM shares their preference for an unsloth version of Qwen 3.5 122b-a10b for coding and asks the community for their recommendations.
High VRAM local coding model — still Qwen 3.6 27B?
The user discusses their experience with Qwen 3.6 27B for local coding tasks and asks for recommendations for larger models (100B+) suitable for systems with 224GB of VRAM.
Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next smaller quant?
A user compares Qwen3.8-27B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next models for intelligence and coding performance with 128GB RAM, seeking advice on which is better.