How Far Have We Come? Comparing LLMs: Sonnet 4 vs. GPT-5.5
Summary
The article compares Claude Sonnet 4 and GPT-5.5 by generating code for a Flappy Bird game, demonstrating significant progress in LLM capabilities over 1.5 years.
Similar Articles
@rohanpaul_ai: atomic[.]chat, a desktop app that runs LLMs locally, ran a very revealing comparison for Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Opus 4…
atomic.chat ran a comparison showing Claude Sonnet 5 matches GPT 5.5 on three physics coding demos at 6x lower cost, using fewer tokens than other models.
@reach_vb: GPT-5.6 Luna Max scores 13.3 points above Sonnet 5 Max on DeepSWE v1.1 while Sonnet costs 44x as much. DeepSWE tests co…
GPT-5.6 Luna Max outperforms Sonnet 5 Max on the DeepSWE v1.1 coding benchmark at a much lower cost, and also shows strong performance compared to Gemini 3.7 Flash Medium.
GPT-5.5 Outperforms (and Hallucinates), Kimi K2.6 Leads Open LLMs, AI Strains Climate Pledges, Strategic Thinking in LLMs vs. Humans
GPT-5.5 sets new state-of-the-art in benchmarks but struggles with hallucination; Kimi K2.6 leads open LLMs; also discusses AI's strain on climate pledges and strategic thinking in LLMs.
GPT-5.6 takes first place on eq-bench's Creative Writing benchmark
GPT-5.6 achieves first place on Eq-Bench's Creative Writing benchmark, demonstrating significant advancement in AI-generated creative text.
GPT-6 Sol vs Sonnet 5.5 at the same cost per task: Sol is more efficient, Sonnet 5.5 has the higher ceiling
GPT-6 Sol is more cost-efficient than Sonnet 5.5 at similar budgets, but Sonnet 5.5 achieves higher performance at increased costs, according to Artificial Analysis data.