Using agents for real problems

Reddit r/AI_Agents News

Summary

The article critiques the focus on mathematical problems in AI research, suggesting that more beneficial applications in infectious disease or neuroscience should be prioritized to better serve humanity.

I read the WSJ article over the weekend that's kicked off the "AI killing humanity" coverage. Lots to unpack in the article but one thing I found interesting is how solving math problems are used as marketing. The section on spend stood out to me... For those that don't have WSJ: The wicked Navier-Stokes problem had vexed mathematicians for nearly a century. AI needed millions of dollars in computing resources and a few days. I've read Machines of Loving Grace. I understand the challenges Dario lays out about physical world dependencies/bottlenecks in biology and neuroscience but why wouldn't we still start there? Forget math proofs for now... there's got to be low hanging fruit in infectious disease or understanding the human brain that would serve as more useful marketing and be beneficial to humanity, no? Or, if we're locked into math as the only domain we'll touch, why not focus on Physics and better understand the universe?
Original Article

Similar Articles

We should stop forcing AI Agents into everything.

Reddit r/AI_Agents

The article criticizes the trend of forcing AI agents into applications that do not need them, warning that this could lead to the AI industry repeating the mistakes of the crypto hype cycle.