@hyhieu226: Sincere advice to paper authors and conference organizers: please cancel ICLR 2027, and work on a policy that restores …
Summary
A Twitter user advises paper authors and conference organizers to cancel ICLR 2027 and implement policies to restore the prestige of top-tier publications.
Similar Articles
@lateinteraction: seeing lots of posts lamenting the "end" of papers / conferences / etc as a measure of productivity but i can't remembe…
The author critiques the reliance on papers and conferences as productivity measures in AI research and presents guidelines for making research impact via open-source artifacts.
ICLR 2027 Deadline is before NeurIPS 2026 Decisions [D]
ICLR 2027 has set its full paper deadline before NeurIPS 2026 decisions are announced, potentially disadvantaging papers that improved after NeurIPS rejection.
Concerns about the ICLR review policy [D]
The author expresses concerns about ICLR's review policy that requires individuals to serve as reviewers if they appear on 3 or more papers, regardless of their qualifications.
Does anyone else miss the old conference ecosystem? [D]
The author reflects on the decline of specialized conferences like BMVC, ACCV, FG, ICIP, and ICASSP, noting that research communities are now concentrated in a few flagship conferences, leading to limited capacity and inconsistent reviews.
@demisama_: something I want to remind myself of in the era of 60k+ ICLR submissions: 1. stay curiosity-driven, not publication-dri…
The author shares personal reminders for conducting AI research, emphasizing curiosity over publication pressure, insights over benchmarks, and thorough investigation over rushed papers.