@quantum_soul1: Strongly recommend this article published by Kuaishou technical team on their official account. New productivity requires new production relations to match. In fact, I recently encountered a similar situation when dealing with some business issues in the company. Extremely high departmental barriers cause agents to have limited efficiency improvement at the macro level of the company, in stark contrast to the significant efficiency improvement at the individual level...
Summary
Recommends the article by Kuaishou technical team about AI agent efficiency, discussing the problem of departmental barriers causing limited efficiency improvement at the company level, and cites Zuckerberg's view that the reason may lie in organizational structure rather than technology.
Similar Articles
@knoYee_: https://x.com/knoYee_/status/2062780637677752366
The author reviews three months of experience using multi-agent collaboration, summarizing five main pain points (such as conflicts between agents, ignoring boundary conditions, self-censorship failure, difficulty in merging decisions, and exposing harder problems after compressed execution) and two insights (the high value of read-only review agents, and that agent conflicts expose ambiguous requirements), emphasizing the core decision-making role of humans in AI collaboration.
@SaitoWu: https://x.com/SaitoWu/status/2058860578291241071
This article discusses the concept of AI-First organizational structure, transforming AI from a supporting tool to a productivity leader, redesigning company processes, and introducing new ideas such as Harness Engineering and Agent Economy.
@ba_niu80557: https://x.com/ba_niu80557/status/2071277244287426980
The article deeply analyzes the internal changes Anthropic faces as AI-generated code becomes extremely efficient: the bottleneck shifts from 'writing' to 'verification', traditional management, long-term planning, and effort measurement become ineffective, attention becomes the new scarce resource, and engineers even feel lonely. These phenomena foreshadow the challenges other companies may face in the future.
@9hills: AI for Work is quite subtle inside many enterprises. Using general-purpose agents (Hermes, WorkBuddy, etc.) paired with the DeepSeek-V4-Pro model can optimize many repetitive tasks. But from what I observe, unlike programmers who actively burn tokens to improve efficiency and accelerate their own obsolescence…
A user observes the current state of internal AI applications: general-purpose agents with DeepSeek V4 Pro can optimize repetitive tasks, but traditional role departments often propose complex requirements that are hard to implement, while secretly using them privately, demonstrating a kind of survival wisdom.
@hongming731: Alibaba's article on organizational R&D in the AI Native era is well worth reading. It addresses a critical foundational issue: for the past two millennia, organizational structures have been built around human limitations. Humans forget, get tired, misunderstand, and have emotions. The number of people one can stably collaborate with and manage is limited, and information inevitably degrades as it passes between hierarchies...
Alibaba released insights on organizational R&D in the AI Native era, pointing out that traditional organizational structures need to shift from accommodating human limitations to adapting to the efficient execution of AI Agents. The article emphasizes that the core bottleneck of AI transformation lies in outdated information formats; implicit experience must be transformed into AI-understandable infrastructure, while preserving the human role in innovation and cultural building.