No, mathematicians or whatever professionals aren't resisting AI just because of 'human value'. They are protecting their economic leverage
Summary
The article argues that professionals are resisting AI to protect their economic leverage rather than for human value, warning that without securing a place in the AI-driven future, widespread unemployment and societal collapse could ensue.
Similar Articles
Mathematicians warn of AI threats to profession as industry encroaches
Mathematicians, via the Leiden Declaration endorsed by the International Mathematical Union, warn that AI threatens core values of mathematical research, including correctness, transparency, and citation practices, while also raising concerns about industry influence and the erosion of traditional standards.
Resist "AI"
The article argues that AI, while useful, is harmful to individuals, organizations, and society due to environmental, intellectual, and human costs, and calls for resistance until these harms are addressed.
Why Do We Need Human Mathematicians Anymore?
The article discusses the impact of AI on mathematics, referencing OpenAI's solution to a Navier-Stokes problem and community reactions, while proposing a human-centric axiom to preserve human expertise amidst AI advancement.
Mathematicians Hate AI. They Can’t Quit It
Mathematicians like Tristan Buckmaster and Andreas Thom continue using AI tools from OpenAI and Anthropic despite grievances over intellectual property and ethical concerns, highlighting the tension between AI utility and academic integrity.
Not all AI workers think the tech could kill everyone
Not all AI workers believe that artificial intelligence poses an existential threat to humanity; many are skeptical of recent high-profile warnings about AI-induced human extinction.