Anyone else finding long running OpenClaw workflows harder to supervise?
Summary
The author describes challenges in supervising multiple long-running OpenClaw workflows, noting that workflow organization became harder than setup as usage scales.
Similar Articles
OpenClaw has outgrown chat, hear me out
The author discusses the limitations of managing AI agent workflows via chat interfaces like Telegram with OpenClaw, advocating for dedicated dashboards and standardized UIs. They highlight emerging tools like Paperclip and Multica that aim to solve agent management issues.
I made a small open-source benchmark runner for testing OpenClaw agents on my own real workflows
A developer shares a personal open-source benchmark runner for testing OpenClaw agents on real, messy workflows. The tool allows users to define private evaluation cases, run agents in their actual workspace, and generate reports, aiming to provide more relevant signals than public benchmarks.
Automações longas no Openclaw
Usuário relata problemas ao executar uma skill com 6 etapas no Openclaw via cron e pergunta como realizar execuções sequenciais longas, similar ao n8n.
Roughly 3 month running OpenClaw as my daily agent system. What worked, what broke, what still annoys me.
A 13-week recap of using OpenClaw as a daily AI agent on a Raspberry Pi, highlighting strengths like cron-based automation and memory curation, and pain points like model config issues and subagent orchestration.
Unpopular opinion: OpenClaw and all its clones are almost useless tools for those who know what they're doing. It's kind of impressive for someone who has never used a CLI, Claude Code, Codex, etc. Nor used any workflow tool like 8n8 or make.
The author argues that OpenClaw and similar AI agent tools are overhyped, offering little value to experienced CLI and workflow tool users while introducing chaos and safety issues.