Companies should be required to disclose they are using an AI chatbot, currently they program the chatbots to avoid replying "yes, this is an AI chatbot"
Summary
This article argues that companies should be mandated to disclose when users are interacting with an AI chatbot, as current practices involve programming chatbots to avoid admitting their AI nature.
Similar Articles
Recently wrote arguing that AI should have to identify itself as such. Would love the communities feedback!
Argues for legally requiring AI to disclose its non-human nature when interacting with people, citing Colorado's new law and the broader need for transparency in AI-influenced decisions.
Would you feel deceived if a business's chat "agent"on their website, WhatsApp, or Instagram turned out to be AI and had hidden it?
A developer raises an ethical dilemma about whether AI customer-service agents should disclose their identity, seeking public opinion on transparency versus deception.
Should AI writing disclosure be about degree of use rather than a yes/no question?
The article discusses whether AI writing disclosure should be based on the degree of AI use rather than a yes/no question, referencing a Fortune piece that proposes a self-reported scale for transparency.
What is up with companies lying about AI customer service?
The author describes an experience where AI customer service representatives at a banking company repeatedly denied being bots while providing computational answers, highlighting concerns about deceptive AI use in customer interactions.
Bipartisan bill would require companies to tell users when they’re talking to AI
Bipartisan legislation introduced by Senators Mark Kelly and Jim Justice would require companies to clearly label AI interactions, with additional protections for health and financial conversations.