What if the government (excluding the Department of War) started using AI for productivity?
Summary
A discussion on how the government (excluding military) could use AI to enhance productivity, with a focus on mental health services as a public good.
Similar Articles
Why stop at replacing IT jobs? Why not build AI that replaces government bureaucracy too?
The article argues that AI should be applied to automate government bureaucracy, reducing costs and corruption, similar to its impact on private sector IT jobs.
If AI creates huge productivity gains, how do we keep people bought in?
Discusses the challenge of public fear that AI will make workers economically unnecessary, suggesting broader ownership of gains (profit-sharing, dividends) to maintain support for AI adoption.
AI agents might become the biggest productivity shift since the internet
The article argues AI agents represent a major productivity shift by moving from answering questions to completing tasks, and discusses current use cases and bottlenecks.
Are we overestimating how quickly AI capability turns into real productivity?
The article questions whether AI's demonstrated capability automatically translates into real-world productivity, highlighting gaps like workflow ownership, reliability, and integration into complex human systems.
Who Will Solve the AI Productivity Puzzle?
Despite widespread adoption, generative AI has not yielded sustained productivity growth, leading OpenAI and Anthropic to launch private-equity-backed consulting ventures for enterprise integration.