Everyone is selling AI agents, but almost nobody is selling the workflows to make them useful.
Summary
The article argues that while many are building and selling AI agents, the real value lies in the workflows and training that make them useful, not the underlying technology.
Similar Articles
built 40+ ai workflows for clients this year... 90% of "agents" are gimmicks tbh
The author criticizes the hype around autonomous AI agents, stating they are often ineffective, and recommends building practical, hardcoded AI workflows using tools like n8n and Claude Sonnet for real-world applications.
AI agents are starting to expose how broken most workflows already were
The article argues that AI agents are revealing how unstructured and chaotic many corporate workflows actually are, suggesting that successful automation depends more on clean systems and documentation than on advanced models.
Are we calling too many workflows “agents”?
The author questions whether many so-called AI agents are better described as workflows, arguing that for repeatable browser tasks, defined workflows may be more reliable than agents that reinterpret steps each time.
How to create an ai agent that actually does something useful, not just a demo?
The article discusses the gap between impressive AI agent demos and real-world deployment, focusing on practical challenges in business processes like sales ops, and calls for production case studies.
the boring part of AI agents nobody builds and everyone needs
A practitioner recounts how deploying AI agents in production required 80% engineering effort on workflow, ownership, and approval processes rather than the model itself, highlighting that the 'boring layer' of shared context and routing is critical for real-world impact.