Are we over-indexing on intelligence and ignoring governance?
Summary
The author argues that AI agent governance is often overlooked in favor of intelligence benchmarks, and introduces an open source project SAFi to enforce runtime boundaries.
Similar Articles
Runtime Governance: The Missing Layer for AI Agents in 2026
The article discusses the need for runtime governance in AI agents to balance autonomy with compliance, introducing SAFi, an open-source framework that enforces policies in real-time and audits actions.
Building and managing AI agents in SAFi
The author introduces SAFi, an open-source runtime governance engine for AI agents, detailing its memory system (ethical, conversational, profile, project) and practical use cases like a work assistant powered by DeepSeek V4.
Is anyone actually enforcing AI governance, or just writing policies?
The article discusses the gap between documented AI governance policies and the practical enforcement of these rules within runtime AI agent workflows.
AI safety is arguing about the wrong boundary
This article argues that the AI safety debate is misdirected, focusing on model alignment and internal controls instead of the critical boundary: external admission authority over agent execution. It warns that systems capable of self-authorizing high-impact actions (e.g., deploying code, moving money) pose a fundamental risk that logging and monitoring cannot mitigate.
A sobering tale of AI governance
This Reddit post discusses a research paper highlighting fundamental challenges in AI governance, including social attack surfaces, failures of social coherence in LLM-backed agents, and the inadequacy of current governance tools for agentic systems.