@FinanceYF5: It is said that a 'certain new model' from zAI is at least as strong as Fable 5 in cybersecurity capabilities. Chubby did some research but only found a Wall Street Journal article. However, that article did not mention a completely new model; instead, it discussed GLM 5.2 as a relatively recent model…
Summary
According to rumors, a certain new model from zAI is at least as strong as Fable 5 in cybersecurity capabilities, but information is limited, only citing a Wall Street Journal article discussing GLM 5.2.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/29/26, 08:44 PM
It is said that “a certain new model” from zAI is at least as strong as Fable 5 in cybersecurity-related capabilities.
Chubby did some research but only found a Wall Street Journal article.
However, that article did not mention a brand-new model, but rather discussed GLM 5.2 as a relatively new model released recently. https://t.co/dpr49aOp35
Similar Articles
@FinanceYF5: Source:
A rumor suggests Zhipu AI's new model, possibly GLM 5.2, matches Fable5 in cybersecurity capabilities, as mentioned in a Wall Street Journal article.
@FinanceYF5: So, either GLM 5.2 is stronger than outsiders think, or the rumors circulating now are misleading. According to WSJ, Zhipu AI's GLM-5.2 can match top US models in certain vulnerability discovery scenarios; and China's 360 Security says its new Tulongf…
According to a WSJ report, Zhipu AI's GLM-5.2 can match top US models in vulnerability discovery scenarios; 360 Security's new tool Tulongfeng is also comparable to Anthropic's Mythos.
@FinanceYF5: 2/ He never looks at benchmark numbers when evaluating models. The only thing he truly cares about is: [The shape of the model's thinking] — How deeply can it understand user intent? — How far can it iterate in its thinking? — Does it make you feel like there's someone on the other side? Fable gave him this sense of aliveness. 'It feels like returning to 2023'
This tweet emphasizes that when evaluating AI models, one should not only look at benchmark numbers but focus on the model's 'shape of thinking' — the depth of understanding user intent, the ability to iterate in thinking, and the feeling of 'someone on the other side'. The author believes Fable excels in this regard, reminiscent of the experience in 2023.
@Khazix0918: https://x.com/Khazix0918/status/2065790596653183156
Zhipu released the GLM 5.2 model, focusing on coding capabilities, open-source and supporting 1M context. Tests show it approaches Claude Opus 4.8 level in large engineering and coding tasks, but lacks multimodal capabilities and is limited by computational power, resulting in slower speed. The article also mentions Anthropic shutting down Fable 5 and Mythos 5 at the request of the U.S. Department of Commerce, highlighting the contrast between open-source and closed AI.
Fable 5 vanished in 96 hours and four days later an MIT model took its arena crown
Anthropic's Fable 5 model disappeared after 96 hours due to export controls, and days later, Z.ai open-sourced GLM-5.2 under MIT license, surpassing Fable 5 on the Design Arena. This highlights that the best model is not always the most accessible, shifting focus from benchmarks to availability and licensing.