@FinanceYF5: It is said that a 'certain new model' from zAI is at least as strong as Fable 5 in cybersecurity capabilities. Chubby did some research but only found a Wall Street Journal article. However, that article did not mention a completely new model; instead, it discussed GLM 5.2 as a relatively recent model…
Summary
According to rumors, a certain new model from zAI is at least as strong as Fable 5 in cybersecurity capabilities, but information is limited, only citing a Wall Street Journal article discussing GLM 5.2.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/29/26, 08:44 PM
It is said that “a certain new model” from zAI is at least as strong as Fable 5 in cybersecurity-related capabilities.
Chubby did some research but only found a Wall Street Journal article.
However, that article did not mention a brand-new model, but rather discussed GLM 5.2 as a relatively new model released recently. https://t.co/dpr49aOp35
Similar Articles
@FinanceYF5: Source:
A rumor suggests Zhipu AI's new model, possibly GLM 5.2, matches Fable5 in cybersecurity capabilities, as mentioned in a Wall Street Journal article.
@FinanceYF5: So, either GLM 5.2 is stronger than outsiders think, or the rumors circulating now are misleading. According to WSJ, Zhipu AI's GLM-5.2 can match top US models in certain vulnerability discovery scenarios; and China's 360 Security says its new Tulongf…
According to a WSJ report, Zhipu AI's GLM-5.2 can match top US models in vulnerability discovery scenarios; 360 Security's new tool Tulongfeng is also comparable to Anthropic's Mythos.
@qqqqqf_: I additionally tested Fable5. I found that it does not achieve very high similarity (>0.9) with most of Anthropic's models. This likely indicates that it could be an unprecedented new base model trained on a mixture of data (just speculation; note that post-training also affects fingerprint results, for reference only). But there is an extra surprise…
User @qqqqqf_ shared fingerprint test results for Fable5 and other models, finding that Fable5 has low similarity with most Anthropic models but very high similarity with kimi k2.7, qwen3-7max, glm5.2, etc., speculating possible data leakage or distillation. At the same time, they released an open source project ai-model-fingerprint for model identification and detection.
GLM-5.5 Leak: It Beats Fable 5
A leaked report claims that Z.ai's upcoming GLM-5.5 model, with over 1 trillion parameters and 1M-token context, will compete directly with Fable 5 and Mythos, targeting an August release and remaining open-weight.
@FinanceYF5: Same task to 4 models: Fable 5 sweeps, but costs 6x more than Opus 4.8. Task: 3 HTML5 physics scenes – broken bridge derailment, canyon collision, monster truck. Fable 5: $3.12, A+, no clipping. GPT 5.5: $1.14, closest to Fable. Opus…
Compares the performance and cost of four AI models (Fable 5, GPT 5.5, Opus 4.8, GLM 5.2) on three HTML5 physics scene tasks. Fable 5 delivers the best quality but costs nearly 6x more than Opus; quality and price are not yet both attainable.