@vasuman: "We are spending millions sending AI experts to learn business. We should be sending business operators to learn AI. Bu…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

一篇关于企业AI落地策略的观点帖,主张与其花重金让AI专家学习业务,不如让业务运营人员快速掌握AI执行能力,并分享了从工作流操作者入手实施AI转型的实践经验。

"We are spending millions sending AI experts to learn business. We should be sending business operators to learn AI. Business knowledge is slow. It took most of my career to instinctively know which trade-offs to make around working capital and inventory. AI execution is fast. An experienced operational team can master agentic tooling, evals, and model orchestration in a matter of months. We are running the harder transfer at immense cost and mistaking it for progress." - Praveen Jonnala, CIO of Vistance Networks I can back this up from every implementation we've done at Varick (Finance, Operations, HR, all of it). The exceptions often live in one person's head. Think the vendor who keeps invoicing against a PO that was closed months ago, or the customer whose payment terms got changed on a phone call and no one updated the ERP. These nuances are never documented, and it's not something you can pick up during a 6-week engagement as an AI engineer. On the flip side, we've seen controllers and Accounts Payable managers learn to read evals and write rules that improve agent outputs in just a few short weeks. As a result, when we come into a company to implement AI, we start with the operators of a workflow. Our engineers sit with them to understand every nook and cranny of the workflow, translate that into rules the agents can use, and then train those operators to manage the agents once we leave. If you're interested in doing this kind of AI transformation inside your company, book a call below.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/18/26, 09:09 AM

“We are spending millions sending AI experts to learn business. We should be sending business operators to learn AI.

Business knowledge is slow. It took most of my career to instinctively know which trade-offs to make around working capital and inventory.

AI execution is fast. An experienced operational team can master agentic tooling, evals, and model orchestration in a matter of months.

We are running the harder transfer at immense cost and mistaking it for progress.“

  • Praveen Jonnala, CIO of Vistance Networks

I can back this up from every implementation we’ve done at Varick (Finance, Operations, HR, all of it).

The exceptions often live in one person’s head. Think the vendor who keeps invoicing against a PO that was closed months ago, or the customer whose payment terms got changed on a phone call and no one updated the ERP. These nuances are never documented, and it’s not something you can pick up during a 6-week engagement as an AI engineer.

On the flip side, we’ve seen controllers and Accounts Payable managers learn to read evals and write rules that improve agent outputs in just a few short weeks.

As a result, when we come into a company to implement AI, we start with the operators of a workflow. Our engineers sit with them to understand every nook and cranny of the workflow, translate that into rules the agents can use, and then train those operators to manage the agents once we leave.

If you’re interested in doing this kind of AI transformation inside your company, book a call below.

Similar Articles

@ba_niu80557: Let's talk some hardcore practical knowledge while I have time this morning. What actually happens between signing a contract for an AI project and it finally running in production? I'll lay out the entire playbook. People in this field can copy it directly, and those not in it can still understand why 95% of enterprise AI pilots end up dead. First, let me say something counterintuitive to the point you might not believe...

X AI KOLs Timeline

This article discusses common reasons for the failure of enterprise AI projects from proof-of-concept to production deployment, highlighting key practices such as MLOps, early inspection of real data, and clear human-machine boundaries. It argues that project failures are often not due to model issues but due to neglect of the engineering implementation phase.

@leslieloser_: Had the privilege of meeting @Zhm20220917, the best at AI transformation in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shanghai, for a few hours. Became even more certain about the following --In the AI era, those closer to production who understand the industry will reap huge startup dividends; understanding AI and boundaries is 20%, understanding production and industry is 80% --Small teams refuse inno…

X AI KOLs Timeline

The article shares insights on entrepreneurial dividends in the AI era, emphasizing that understanding industry and production is more critical than mastering AI technology. Companies prioritize actual problem-solving capabilities over the models themselves.