Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 in 3D destruction physics
Summary
Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 in benchmarks for 3D destruction physics.
Similar Articles
@rohanpaul_ai: Fable 5 absolutely crushed the HTML5 physics contest, but cost 6x more than Opus 4.8 and 39× more than GLM 5.2 in that …
A comparison of four AI models (Fable 5, Opus 4.8, GLM 5.2, GPT 5.5) on generating HTML5 canvas physics demos shows Fable 5 outperforms others in quality but costs significantly more per test.
Fable 5 benchmark with remotion video
Fable 5 shows overall improvement over Opus 4.8 in video generation benchmarks, but Gemini 3.1 Pro demonstrates more artistic vision despite issues with tool calls and buggy code.
ProgramBench result for Fable 5 is in, doubling Opus 4.8 even with 4.8 fallback "99% of the runs"
ProgramBench results show Fable 5 achieving double the performance of Opus 4.8, even with fallback to 4.8 in 99% of runs.
@FinanceYF5: Same task to 4 models: Fable 5 sweeps, but costs 6x more than Opus 4.8. Task: 3 HTML5 physics scenes – broken bridge derailment, canyon collision, monster truck. Fable 5: $3.12, A+, no clipping. GPT 5.5: $1.14, closest to Fable. Opus…
Compares the performance and cost of four AI models (Fable 5, GPT 5.5, Opus 4.8, GLM 5.2) on three HTML5 physics scene tasks. Fable 5 delivers the best quality but costs nearly 6x more than Opus; quality and price are not yet both attainable.
Anthropic releases Opus 5 with ‘close’ to Fable 5’s capabilities
Anthropic released Claude Opus 5, which it says approaches the capabilities of its more powerful Fable 5 model while offering stronger cybersecurity safeguards and lower pricing.