@Fenng: 现在鼓吹人工智能消除多少岗位之类的言论，都是无稽之谈。不值得为这种屁结论花太多时间讨论，两小儿辩日一般。 美国互联网企业裁员，实属正常。Covid 期间，这些企业招了太多的人，以至于人浮于事，效率低下，还都不想来公司上班，总嚷着居家办公，…
Summary
现在鼓吹人工智能消除多少岗位之类的言论，都是无稽之谈。不值得为这种屁结论花太多时间讨论，两小儿辩日一般。 美国互联网企业裁员，实属正常。Covid 期间，这些企业招了太多的人，以至于人浮于事，效率低下，还都不想来公司上班，总嚷着居家办公，小脾气惯得不得了。现在企业用 AI 作为理由裁员，也是最好的借口和时机。对那些被裁的人，网上的自媒体也不用大惊小怪，他们不用再被所谓的「资本家」剥削了，这难道不好吗？想怎么躺平怎么躺，最差也可以跟大家一样来做自媒体。其乐融融，这难道不好吗？ 做人嘛，重要的是要开心。 你饿不饿？今天提肛了吗？ 提～
Similar Articles
@seclink: China's 'Quiet Layoffs' Wave: AI Substitution Accelerating - Source: Reuters (6/10) - Content: Reuters in-depth report on Chinese companies carrying out massive 'quiet layoffs' while promoting AI. On Xiaohongshu, the 'AI anxiety' topic has over 7.8 million views. Alibaba's 'Wukong' multi-Agent platform directly uses '…
Reuters reports that Chinese companies are carrying out massive 'quiet layoffs' while promoting AI. On Xiaohongshu, the 'AI anxiety' topic has over 7.8 million views. Alibaba's 'Wukong' multi-Agent platform uses 'One-Person Company' as its selling point, preset to replace positions in e-commerce, livestreaming, software development, etc.
@lifesinger: 听闻字节全面收缩在 AI 应用层的投入，应用层聚焦到豆包，硬件层押注 PICO+ AI 硬件。 原因是：烧不起，以 2025 年的投入去烧 AI 应用，字节现金流撑不过 2027 年。 巧合的是，最近还听闻有几家 ARR 过亿美元的 AI…
听闻字节全面收缩在 AI 应用层的投入，应用层聚焦到豆包，硬件层押注 PICO+ AI 硬件。 原因是：烧不起，以 2025 年的投入去烧 AI 应用，字节现金流撑不过 2027 年。 巧合的是，最近还听闻有几家 ARR 过亿美元的 AI 应用公司，开始在默默裁员，公司现金流压力非常大，很难持续。 还有一个偶然看到的新闻是，百万粉丝博主 Dan Koe 的创业产品 Eden，因烧钱太快，决定大幅裁员，产品停止迭代。 这一切都在揭示一个规律： 用互联网的思维去做 AI 产品创业，死路一条。因为 AI 产品没有规模效应，追求 DAU 等互联网时代的规模指标，会是有钱的 AI 产品存活不下去的主因。 没钱的 AI 产品创业公司，因为没钱可烧，无法追求规模，反而有机会看见真相。然后逐步赚取到真正的利润，有机会一步一步长大。 尊重经营，尊重时间。每个 AI 产品的创业者，可能都得重新审视这八个字。
@elliotchen100: The Age of AI Displacement is Here—How Can Ordinary People Survive? (Translation) Over the past two years, following AI news has left many with mixed feelings. On one hand, it's exhilarating: things that used to take days can now be done in minutes. On the other, there's a nagging unease: if I can use these tools, so can my boss and my company—so what am I really worth? D…
This translated article introduces Dan Koe's perspective: The most important thing in the AI era is not to worry about being replaced, but to cultivate abilities that don't rely on a single system. By accumulating your own work, audience, and clients, you can enhance your resilience against risks.
@PandaTalk8: https://x.com/PandaTalk8/status/2065311206840353163
The article analyzes the wave of layoffs caused by AI, pointing out that one-person companies (OPC) are a trend but most people can't make money; the key to success lies in serving high-value clients, doing dirty work that cannot be standardized, and maintaining long-term patience.
@FinanceYF5: Will AI Take Your Job? 1/ "How much of my job can AI replace?" — That's the wrong question. The biggest takeaway I got from this Benedict Evans podcast is this: What you should really ask is not a percentage, but "Is this a task or a job?"
Discusses AI's impact on jobs, citing Benedict Evans' podcast: the key is not how much AI can replace, but distinguishing between a task and a job.