@omarsar0: Great overview of always-on agents. (bookmark it) It's a new 130+ pages survey on always-on agents. Simply put it, alwa…

X AI KOLs Following Papers

Summary

A new 130+ page survey on always-on agents, which are systems whose future behavior depends on durable state built up across earlier interactions. It treats state as more than memory, scoring each state item on six axes across a lifecycle, and introduces the Always-On Evaluation Protocol (AOEP-v0) to govern state mutation and recovery.

Great overview of always-on agents. (bookmark it) It's a new 130+ pages survey on always-on agents. Simply put it, always-on agents are systems whose future behavior depends on durable state built up across earlier interactions. It treats that state as more than memory. Task ledgers, permissions, credentials, commitments, provenance, triggers, and externally committed effects all count. The survey scores each state item on six axes, authority, scope, mutability, provenance, recoverability, and actionability, across a lifecycle that runs from write and retrieve through forget, audit, and rollback. Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30306 Learn to build effective AI agents in our academy: https://academy.dair.ai
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/06/26, 04:00 AM

Great overview of always-on agents.

(bookmark it)

It’s a new 130+ pages survey on always-on agents.

Simply put it, always-on agents are systems whose future behavior depends on durable state built up across earlier interactions. It treats that state as more than memory. Task ledgers, permissions, credentials, commitments, provenance, triggers, and externally committed effects all count.

The survey scores each state item on six axes, authority, scope, mutability, provenance, recoverability, and actionability, across a lifecycle that runs from write and retrieve through forget, audit, and rollback.

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30306

Learn to build effective AI agents in our academy: https://academy.dair.ai


Always-OnAgents:A Survey of Persistent Memory, State, and Governance in LLMAgents

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30306 View PDF

Abstract:Always-on agents are systems whose future behavior depends on durable state accumulated across earlier interactions. We treat them as persistent-state systems: the operative system includes retrievable memories, but also task ledgers, permissions, credentials, commitments, provenance and audit records, shared state, trigger conditions, and externally committed effects linked to those records. The survey reads the literature through six diagnostic axes for each state item, authority, scope, mutability, provenance, recoverability, and actionability, and through a lifecycle in which state is written, validated, organized, retrieved, acted upon, updated, forgotten, audited, and sometimes rolled back. Across a 435-work coded corpus, treated as a scoped map rather than an exhaustive census, the literature concentrates more heavily on accumulating and retrieving state than on governing, recovering, or relinquishing it. We therefore introduce the Always-On Evaluation Protocol (AOEP-v0), a pilot evaluation contract that makes these governance requirements concrete by scoring state mutation and recovery obligations rather than answer quality alone. The resulting agenda connects always-on agents to databases, distributed systems, formal methods, capability security, and machine unlearning.

Submission history

From: Tianyu Ding [view email] **[v1]**Mon, 29 Jun 2026 13:47:42 UTC (1,588 KB)

Similar Articles

does the "always on" agent need to be literally always on?

Reddit r/openclaw

Discusses the architectural design of always-on AI agents, proposing that they need not be literally always on; instead, they could be made more ephemeral using serverless compute and state management to save costs.