this just isn't sustainable.
Summary
A user reports that using a GPT model (possibly GPT-5.5) for a spreadsheet task cost $10 in heavily subsidized tokens, with actual compute cost estimated at $100, arguing that current AI pricing is unsustainable.
Similar Articles
GPT-5.5 may burn fewer tokens, but it always burns more cash
OpenAI's GPT-5.5 costs 49–92% more than GPT-5.4 in practice despite claimed token efficiency improvements, while Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.7 also raised effective costs by 12–27% for longer prompts, reflecting a broader trend of rising frontier model prices as both companies face massive projected losses.
Every AI prompt costs money — and that changes everything
The article argues that the real challenge in AI isn't just building smarter models but making them cost-efficient at scale, highlighting the importance of reducing token usage, improving speed, and optimizing infrastructure.
The Unsustainable Subsidy (1 minute read)
An analysis of how Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic are adjusting their AI model pricing strategies as cash constraints and high capex spending drive price increases, ending the era of subsidized AI.
Why are AI models getting more expensive?
The article discusses the unexpected rise in costs for advanced AI models like Opus 4.7, GPT 5.5, and Gemini 3.5 flash, contrasting with earlier expectations of decreasing prices.
@IntuitMachine: Your AI coding agent just burned $2 on a single bug fix. You thought it was "cheap automation." Here's what 16,000 prod…
An analysis of AI coding agent costs reveals that agentic workflows can use up to 3,500x more tokens than a simple ChatGPT call, with most waste coming from redundant context loading. The article suggests tracking repeated file actions and using efficient models to cut costs.