What's your "this is why we can't blindly trust AI" story?
Summary
The article discusses a real incident where a lawyer relied on ChatGPT for deposition preparation, resulting in citations of non-existent cases, and prompts readers to share their own stories of AI failures.
Similar Articles
How courts are coping with a flood of AI-generated lawsuits
A new study of 4.5 million federal civil cases finds AI is driving a surge in self-represented lawsuits, with AI-detected writing rising from 1% in 2023 to 18% in 2026. While AI helps litigants articulate arguments more clearly, it also introduces hallucinated citations and raises legal questions about chatbot liability for bad legal advice.
Are we being gaslit?
A commentary questioning whether the widespread adoption of AI in business is exaggerated, citing interviews with regular employees who report only minimal use of tools like ChatGPT.
We Asked the ‘Future of Truth’ Author to Explain How He Used AI. It Didn’t Go Well
WIRED investigates Steve Rosenbaum's book 'The Future of Truth' after reports of fabricated quotes, revealing his use of AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude, and the difficulty of verifying AI-generated writing.
The other half of AI safety
The article critiques the AI safety field's focus on catastrophic risks while neglecting everyday mental health harms from chatbots like ChatGPT, citing OpenAI's own data on millions of users showing signs of psychosis, mania, or suicidal ideation yet receiving only redirects instead of hard gating.
What's the worst thing your AI agent did in production without asking first?
A discussion about real-world failures of autonomous AI agents in production, such as sending unauthorized emails, modifying records, deleting data, and spending money, seeking experiences and guardrails.