[ICML 2026] Scores increased and then decreased!! [D]
Summary
A researcher discusses their ICML 2026 paper review experience where a reviewer increased their score during rebuttal but then decreased it again, expressing concern about rejection prospects.
Similar Articles
NeurIPS 2026: If the rebuttal addresses your concern, please raise your score [D]
An opinion piece urging NeurIPS reviewers to raise scores when rebuttals address their stated concerns, regardless of personal taste, sparking discussion about the review process.
NeurIPS 2026 Reviewer: AI-Generated Rebuttals (and Paper) [D]
A NeurIPS reviewer reports encountering a paper and rebuttals that appear entirely LLM-generated, expressing frustration and seeking advice on how to evaluate such submissions.
AC comment and our reply disappeared on OpenReview [D]
A user on OpenReview noticed that an Area Chair's comment and their reply have disappeared, raising concerns about potential bias in paper rejection decisions. They are seeking confirmation from others if this is a normal occurrence.
AAAI 2027 Review: No code submission? [D]
A reviewer for AAAI 2027 expresses surprise at the low number of paper submissions with code, despite the conference's emphasis on reproducibility, and asks for opinions on whether lack of code should affect review scores.
neurips 2026: ACs and reviewers have disappeared [D]
Authors of a NeurIPS 2026 submission report that reviewers and ACs went silent after they submitted their rebuttal early via the Rebuttal button, with no notifications triggered for either side, leaving them anxious with only a day left in the discussion period.