@EXM7777: https://x.com/EXM7777/status/2074158459545854232
Summary
The article outlines five workflows to extract intelligence from Fable 5, a frontier AI model, before it moves from subscription to pay-per-token credits, emphasizing capturing judgment and knowledge that cheaper models cannot replicate.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/06/26, 06:16 PM
Do this on your last day with Fable
You can extract Fable 5’s intelligence out of the model before it’s gone… and i’m going to teach you the 5 workflows that do it, with every prompt ready to paste
because tomorrow Fable 5 leaves your subscription
it moves to pay-per-token credits, and if you’re on a normal Claude plan, that arithmetic means one thing: it’s gone for good
so today is the last flat-rate day for the smartest model available, and the way it’s being spent is mostly wrong
the lists going around say build a website, ship a few demo apps, generate a month of content
every one of those fails the only test that should rank your day
the test is below, then the five moves that pass it
[VISUAL: hero, the irreversibility filter as a decision tree]
if you want the full training on getting real business output from models like this, and turning that output into income, that’s what the real time AI ops community is for: weeklyaiops.com
the one test you need to run
one question sorts everything you could do today: can a cheaper model redo this tomorrow?
a website, a demo app, a batch of posts… Opus, the everyday Claude model that stays in your plan, rebuilds any of those next week for nothing
spending the final hours of a frontier model on work a mid-tier model handles is like hiring a surgeon to take blood pressure lol
what a cheaper model can’t redo tomorrow is anything that requires fable-level judgment to create but only ordinary intelligence to use
-
a standard written down
-
a roadmap already reasoned through
-
a knowledge vault already distilled
-
a skill that fires on its own
those keep their full value after the model behind them is out of reach
the pattern is old: the most copied training dataset of the llama era was built by pulling 52,000 answers out of a frontier model and training a small open one on them, total generation cost under $500
that frontier model got retired… the teacher is dead, everything trained on it still runs
so the strategy for today is extraction, not conversation
make fable write down everything it knows about your business before it leaves
if you’re starting from zero with this model, the full course covers the setup groundwork:
Machina@EXM7777·Jul 2 ArticleHow to master Fable 5 (Full Course)Anthropic not only just released the best model ever built, they introduced us to a whole new world of possibilities… Fable 5 is a category of its own right now - until GPT 5.6 Sol launches, there’s…2270534245K
now the five moves
1. plant fable’s judgment in your workspace
the highest-value artifact a frontier model leaves behind is a standard… an answer helps you once, a standard upgrades every answer that comes after it
your CLAUDE.md, your skills, your learnings files, your memory setup: this is the layer every future model reads before it touches your work
today, fable writes that layer at a level opus can follow but could never author
run this in every project you care about:
xmlread this entire project and how i work in it
then rewrite my CLAUDE.md as the operating manual a less capable model would need to work here at your level:
the conventions i follow and the ones you’d add the mistakes a weaker model will make in this codebase, named, with the rule that prevents each the quality bar per deliverable, written as checkable criteria, not adjectives what to do when uncertain: the exact escalation rules
then propose the 3 skills that would save me the most hours, and write them in full
the criteria line is the point
a cheaper model can’t invent a quality bar, but it applies a written one fine
next up: pointing that same judgment at the business itself instead of the workspace
2. the consultant audit
fable’s verified edge is judgment on hard, messy problems: on the hardest coding benchmark tier it scores more than double the next model, and the gap widens as difficulty rises
so give it the hardest messy problem you own: your business
open a session with access to your projects, your numbers, whatever context you can feed it, and run:
xmlact as the consultant i can’t afford
audit everything: projects, offers, workflows, pricing, where my time goes
deliver a roadmap i can execute with a less capable model:
ranked moves, highest expected return first per move: why, the exact steps, what done looks like, what a weaker model needs to be told to execute it the three things i should stop doing, with the reasoning written out in full
the deliverable rule carries the value: the reasoning gets written down today, while the model that can produce it is flat-rate
tomorrow opus doesn’t need to be brilliant, it needs to follow a brilliant document
and a roadmap is only as good as the knowledge underneath it, which is move three
3. the second brain run
research is where the extraction runs deepest: long multi-step synthesis is fable’s widest measured lead over every other model
so spend a slice of today on volume: deep research runs on your niche, your competitors, your customers’ problems, the methods you keep meaning to study
then mine every run into an Obsidian vault, the free note app where each note links to related notes, one insight per note
the vault becomes the context every future session reads
full walkthrough of that mining system here:
Machina@EXM7777·Jul 3 ArticleHow to build a second brain with Fable 5I’m going to show you, step by step, how to turn Fable 5 into a machine that knows your business inside out… and ships outputs that look nothing like what everyone else is getting the tool is a…643322.5K1.5M
don’t summarize into one long report… atomize
a hundred linked one-insight notes get retrieved and reused, a 40-page report gets stored and forgotten
the first three moves bank judgment
the fourth spends the thing you actually lose tomorrow: unattended hours
4. fire the goals
fable’s signature capability is holding one job for hours without losing the plot
that endurance is exactly what stops being flat-rate tomorrow, so today it goes to work
two commands in Claude Code, the terminal app the model runs in:
/goal sets a finish line instead of a prompt: you describe what done looks like, and the model keeps working turn after turn while a second, smaller model checks the condition after every turn and only stops the run when it’s met
dynamic workflows are the scale layer: the model writes an orchestration script for your task, and that script runs dozens of subagents in the background, in parallel, cross-checking each other’s findings while your session stays free
the combination is the move: a /goal holds the finish line, the workflow does the fan-out
xml/goal every module in this repo has a test file, the full test suite passes with the complete green run pasted in this chat, and a migration-notes.md documents every change… or stop after 25 turns and paste the failures
two rules make this safe instead of expensive:
demand pasted proof in the finish line: the judge model reads only the conversation, it can’t run your tests or open your files, so the condition asks for the green run pasted, never promised
cap every run: turns or wall-clock, written into the condition, one unattended loop without a cap billed $6,000 by morning
and mind the meter: fable burns weekly limits roughly twice as fast as opus, and only half your weekly limit applies to it in the first place
pick the two or three goals with the most locked-up value, not ten
loops, goals, and 25 ready workflows to steal from:
Machina@EXM7777·Jul 4 ArticleThe Fable Loop Library: 25 Workflows on Autopiloti’m going to teach you how to run Fable 5 on autopilot, using my own library of loops and goals… 25 workflows, each with a prompt and the exact tool it plugs into the method follows karpathy’s…321281K655K
everything so far extracts what fable knows
the last move extracts how it thinks, automatically, for the rest of the day
5. the skill that documents how fable thinks
every time fable cracks a hard problem today, its approach evaporates when the session ends
this move installs a recorder
create the file .claude/skills/extract-approach/SKILL.md:
then wire it into CLAUDE.md so it fires without being asked:
xml## learning law after every non-trivial solved problem, run the extract-approach skill before moving on a solution without its learnings note is unfinished work
now spend the rest of the day working fable hard on your real backlog: the gnarly bug, the architecture decision you’ve been circling
every solve leaves a note behind, and the notes are the distillate: fable’s reasoning, sitting in your repo, readable by every model that comes after
this is the compounding move, and it’s also the one to install FIRST if you only have an hour… it converts all your remaining fable time into permanent assets automatically
[VISUAL: the five moves as a system map, what each one leaves behind after july 7]
after tomorrow
this exact situation will repeat
the pattern of the last year: a frontier model appears, gets re-priced, gets pulled, sometimes comes back, eventually retires
one major model was removed with no notice, resurrected after the backlash, then retired anyway six months later
outputs you don’t save while you have access can’t be reconstructed once it’s gone
every teacher leaves… what you extracted is what you keep
so keep this playbook
the next time a frontier window opens, you won’t spend it on demo apps
quick recap
the test: can a cheaper model redo this tomorrow… if yes, skip it
- workspace: fable rewrites CLAUDE.md + skills as checkable standards
- audit: fable the consultant writes the roadmap, opus executes it later
- second brain: deep research runs, mined into an atomized Obsidian vault
- goals: /goal + dynamic workflows on your highest-value backlog, pasted proof + hard caps
- recorder: the extract-approach skill, wired into CLAUDE.md, one learnings note per solved problem
order if time is short: 5 first, then 4 (it runs alone), then 1, 2, 3
the training, the skills library, and the weekly guides that go with this live at weeklyaiops.com
Similar Articles
@EXM7777: https://x.com/EXM7777/status/2073432521954697653
A guide to using Fable 5 and Claude Code to create automated workflows (loops and goals) for AI agents, including 25 workflow examples with prompts and tool integration.
@EXM7777: https://x.com/EXM7777/status/2073045719020343705
A step-by-step guide on building a second brain using Obsidian and the Fable 5 AI model, showing how to create a persistent knowledge base that improves AI outputs. The system uses plain text markdown files for memory, enabling agents to cite past decisions and produce more personalized results.
@EXM7777: for a few years, playing with AI was a fair game anyone could get near unlimited access to frontier compute for as litt…
AI access is becoming restricted as frontier models become strategic assets, but the author argues current models are already sufficient for making money, so users should focus on building skills rather than waiting for better models.
A post to actually talk about peoples' experiences with Fable
A user shares their positive experience using the Fable AI model for analyzing a 180-page document on Japanese literature, noting it outperformed other models despite high token usage.
@aiwarts: https://x.com/aiwarts/status/2073962247240773984
Detailed introduction to the most practical prompt engineering tips before Fable5 goes offline, including letting the model run experiments autonomously, optimizing workflows, and reducing token consumption through subagent allocation, along with other practical experiences.