@DLKFZWilliam2: If this is real, I’m probably gonna get flamed to death. Because Old Ma’s diehard fans shelled out $300 to subscribe ba…
Summary
The author reacts to a possible pricing revelation about a product whose early fans paid around $300 to subscribe, anticipating backlash from long-time supporters if the rumor turns out to be real.
Similar Articles
There Should Be Way More Backlash To OpenAI's $500/Month, $6,000 A Year Subscription
The author criticizes OpenAI's $500/month subscription as setting a bad precedent that will normalize skyrocketing AI prices, citing past price hikes and usage cuts, and contrasting this with Greg Brockman's rising net worth.
From cheap tool to premium subscription: When a beloved app's price skyrockets
Ars Technica reports on how beloved consumer apps like Evernote, Plex, and Quicken have sharply raised prices, with Bending Spoons' SEC filing revealing how it deliberately tested and squeezed loyal Evernote users to boost revenue.
A Note from LWN
LWN announces a 20% subscription price increase starting September 15 due to inflation, aiming to sustain independent coverage and enhance site features while thanking readers for support.
@LDT0545: Would you pay $200/month for truly unlimited Codex?
A user asks if developers would pay $200 per month for unlimited access to OpenAI's Codex AI coding tool, sparking discussion on pricing and value in the AI community.
@AYi_AInotes: After OpenClaw founder’s leak, it’s clear why cheap agent subs get you instantly banned with no refund
OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger claims budget AI-agent subscriptions are bait to steal your code, not earn your money—and running agents gets you permanently suspended without a refund.