@aaronsebesta: .@danshipper has consistently led on AI and this is a glimpse at what’s next. Take the time to read it then use the age…
Summary
Dan Shipper reports that automating with AI agents has increased human work and employee count, highlighting structural reasons why AI drives up demand for expert labor.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/21/26, 07:36 PM
.@danshipper has consistently led on AI and this is a glimpse at what’s next.
Take the time to read it then use the agent mode to deep dive.
You’ll be 6 months ahead of competitors
Dan Shipper 📧 (@danshipper): We’ve automated every single thing we can @every with AI agents.
And yet there’s way more human work to do than ever. We’ve gone from 4 -> 30 human employees since GPT-3.
I wrote a report on the structural reasons: how AI makes expert competence cheap, why that drives up demand
Similar Articles
@rileybeans_: I need to go through this in detail, but on a quick scroll through it is impressive. A true look at where things curren…
A commentary on Dan Shipper's report about how AI automation paradoxically increases the demand for human work, as evidenced by a company growing from 4 to 30 employees despite automating everything possible with AI agents.
@tbpn: CEO of Every @danshipper says AI increases the demand for human experts because it provides "cheap competence" that onl…
Dan Shipper, CEO of Every, argues that AI increases demand for human experts by providing 'cheap competence' that only humans can transform into valuable, differentiated work, comparing AI to a sandwich where humans frame and evaluate the output.
@AriX: Loved this piece.
Dan Shipper reports that despite automating everything possible with AI agents, his company has grown from 4 to 30 human employees since GPT-3, arguing that AI makes expert competence cheap and drives up demand for human work.
@itsolelehmann: this was probably my favorite read on AI this year. kudos to Dan for writing it his core point: more AI = more work for…
An analysis arguing that AI increases the demand for human work by making routine tasks cheap and easy, forcing humans to focus on higher-level direction, quality control, and novel problem-solving.
@lennysan: .@danshipper: "Automation is a lie. Every time you automate something, you need a human on top of it, making sure that …
Dan Shipper argues that automation always requires human oversight and reflects on his accurate AI predictions, including the overlooked potential of Claude Code.