@DaveShapi: The weirdest thing about AI discourse right now is that acceleration is incel-coded and safety is slut-coded. I will no…
Summary
A tweet discusses the current AI discourse, suggesting acceleration is linked to incel culture and safety to a different stereotype, with no further explanation.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/20/26, 11:20 PM
The weirdest thing about AI discourse right now is that acceleration is incel-coded and safety is slut-coded.
I will not elaborate further.
Similar Articles
@Miles_Brundage: Funny that a lot of AI + VC people spent years casting people who want basic guardrails as "decels" when the real decel…
A tweet criticizing AI and venture capital individuals for mislabeling those advocating for AI guardrails as 'decels', suggesting that others are the actual decelerators of progress.
I don't understand accelerationists
The author expresses confusion about AI accelerationists, arguing that if even AI companies want to slow down, acceleration might be dangerous and counterproductive, with slowing down potentially increasing safety and utopian chances.
@kevinnbass: AI Safety People: We need to make sure AI is aligned with humanity. Also AI Safety People: I practice polyamory with my…
A tweet criticizing AI safety advocates for their personal practices that appear to conflict with their goals of aligning AI with humanity.
@deanwball: The best in ai politics is the one between the anti-AI leftists and the hardest core accelerationists, who both cling t…
A tweet notes the amusing alignment between anti-AI leftists and hardcore accelerationists in denying AI as a transformative technology.
@VraserX: AI isn’t slowing down because the tech hit a wall. It’s slowing down because one very specific safety culture won the n…
AI development is slowing not due to technical limits but because safety-focused narratives, particularly from Anthropic's EA-aligned perspective, have framed frontier AI as dangerous, leading to restricted public access and reduced competition.